Archive by Author

OSCAR PARTY PLANNING

6 Mar

The good folks at KNBC, the NBC affiliate in Los Angeles, asked me to discuss the Oscar party scene on their “News Raw” program yesterday, which I did via telephone, as you can see/hear starting at 2:18 into the video above. Though my primary focus is on the Academy Awards show itself, I have had the privilege/thrill of attending the Academy’s post-show Governors Ball — which I wrote about in-depth last year for the Los Angeles Times — so I was able to offer some commentary about what that’s all about, as well as what several of this year’s other events will entail (including the house party that is being thrown for “The Hurt Locker” producer Nicolas Chartier because he has been banned from attending the show itself).

IF YOU’RE IN HOLLYWOOD…

6 Mar

basterds

basterds

When I first traveled out west to Hollywood, I was tremendously disappointed by the lack of, well, anything to do with the making and/or history of movies. Sure, there’s only one major movie studio that’s still located within Hollywood proper, Paramount Pictures, but most people can do little more than drive by the studio gates. Sure, there’s the Kodak Theatre, but that’s only used for the Oscars once a year, and the rest of the time looks like virtually any other busy mall. Sure, there’s the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, but the only real reason to go there is if you’re a film scholar who wants to study in its library. And, sure, there’s the Hollywood Walk of Fame and the handprints, footprints, and autographs engraved in the cement in front of Grauman’s Chinese Theatre, but — like Times Square on New Year’s Eve or Stonehenge on any day of the year — it gets old pretty quickly.

These days, though, there’s one reservoir in the desert: the Hollywood History Museum, which is located in the Max Factor Building at 1660 North Highland Avenue, just off of Hollywood Boulevard and mere steps from the Kodak. Whenever I’m in town, I stop by to check out both the great permanent exhibits (including Oscars, photos, posters, costumes, and props from movies old and new, such as dresses worn by the stars of “Gone with the Wind” and Hannibal Lecter’s entire jail cell from “The Silence of the Lambs”) and the latest temporary exhibits.

This week may be the best of all to pay a visit to the museum because, in honor of the awards season, it is featuring a special exhibit called — get this — “And The Winner Is…” that is being guest curated by my former Los Angeles Times colleague Tom O’Neil. Tom and the museum — with the cooperation of most of the major studios — have hosted incarnations of this event during each of the past several awards seasons, but it seems to me that they have never have as many neat items on display as they do this year, including costumes and props from this year’s nominees “The Blind Side,” “Bright Star,” “The Hurt Locker,” “Inglourious Basterds,” “Julie & Julia,” “Star Trek,” “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,” and “The Young Victoria,” as well as unnominated popular favorites like “(500) Days of Summer” and “Twilight: New Moon.”

The Hollywood History Museum is open Wednesdays to Sundays from 10am to 5pm. The cost of admission is $15 for adults, $12 for students and seniors, and $5 for kids age 5 and younger. The museum accepts Citipass and Go L.A. cards.

THAT TIME OF YEAR AGAIN…

4 Mar

Here is a video clip of my appearance today on WTNH-8, the ABC News affiliate serving the State of Connecticut, for whom I have shared my Oscar picks for nine consecutive years and now serve as a regular entertainment contributor. (Please excuse the tux — the producer asked me to wear it to help add to the mood of a segment about the Oscars!)

A NEW SORT OF CONTEST…

4 Mar

il-divo

il-divo

I just had more fun than I should have filling out my picks in AwardsDaily’s first annual “Predict the Oscars WRONG Contest,” which challenges you to not pick the correct winner in every category. That sounds easier than it is, especially when it comes to categories like best live action short in which there is no clear favorite and all of the nominees have a legitimate chance to win. Anyway, here are the nominees that I identified as the least likely to win their respective categories:

BEST PICTURE

“District 9” (TriStar)

BEST DIRECTOR

Lee Daniels (“Precious”)

BEST ACTOR

Morgan Freeman (“Invictus”)

BEST ACTRESS

Helen Mirren (“The Last Station”)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Matt Damon (“Invictus”)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Penelope Cruz (“Nine”)

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell (“District 9”)

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Alessandro Camon, Oren Moverman (“The Messenger”)

BEST ANIMATED FILM

“The Secret of Kells” (GKIDS)

BEST DOCUMENTARY FILM

“Burma VJ” (Oscilloscope)

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM

“The Milk of Sorrow” (Peru)

BEST ART DIRECTION

“The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus” (Dave Warren, Anastasia Masaro, Caroline Smith)

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

“Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (Bruno Delbonnel)

BEST COSTUME DESIGN

“The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus (Monique Prudhomme)

BEST FILM EDITING

“District 9 (Julian Clarke)

BEST MAKEUP

“Il Divo” (Aldo Signoretti, Vittorio Sodano)

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE

“Sherlock Holmes” (Hans Zimmer)

BEST ORIGINAL SONG

“Loin de Paname” (“Paris 36”)

BEST SOUND EDITING

“Up” (Michael Silvers, Tom Myers)

BEST SOUND MIXING

“Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers, Geoffrey Patterson)

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS

“District 9” (Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros, Matt Aitken)

BEST SHORT FILM (ANIMATED)

French Roast (Fabrice O. Joubert)

BEST SHORT FILM (DOCUMENTARY)

The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner (Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher)

BEST SHORT FILM (LIVE ACTION)

The New Tenants (Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson)

Photo: A scene from best makeup nominee “Il Divo.” Credit: MPI and Music Box Films.

TO PRESENT OR NOT TO PRESENT? WE’LL SEE…

2 Mar

<b>TO PRESENT OR NOT TO PRESENT? WE’LL SEE…</b>

There have been rumblings, of late, that Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic — the co-producers of the 82nd Oscars show, which will air Sunday night on ABC — have decided to scrap last year’s addition of having past acting winners introduce current acting nominees and instead have friends of current nominees introduce current nominees. Apparently, a few of the actual pairings have even leaked out, but who knows whether or not those reports can be trusted? What I do know is that it’s always fun to speculate about who will present what/to whom, so here — based on existing rumors and my own gut — are my best guesses. (I’ll be happy if even just a few turn out to be correct!)

Best picture

Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts

Best director

Steven Spielberg and…

  • Barbra Streisand for Kathryn Bigelow
  • Sigourney Weaver for James Cameron
  • Tyler Perry for Lee Daniels
  • Ivan Reitman for Jason Reitman
  • Samuel L. Jackson for Quentin Tarantino

Best actor

Kate Winslet and…

  • Robert Downey, Jr. for Jeff Bridges
  • Jason Bateman for George Clooney
  • Tom Ford for Colin Firth
  • Jack Nicholson for Morgan Freeman
  • Charlize Theron for Jeremy Renner

Best actress

Sean Penn and…

  • Keanu Reeves for Sandra Bullock
  • James McAvoy for Helen Mirren
  • Peter Sarsgaard for Carey Mulligan
  • Oprah Winfrey for Gabby Sidibe
  • Stanley Tucci for Meryl Streep

Best supporting actor

Penelope Cruz and…

  • Ben Affleck for Matt Damon
  • Ben Foster for Woody Harrelson
  • Julie Andrews for Christopher Plummer
  • Anne Hathaway for Stanley Tucci
  • Diane Kruger for Christoph Waltz

Best supporting actress

  • Queen Latifah for Mo’Nique
  • Pedro Almodovar for Penelope Cruz
  • Jude Law for Vera Farmiga
  • Jake Gyllenhaal for Maggie Gyllenhaal
  • Kristen Stewart for Anna Kendrick

Best adapted screenplay & Best original screenplay

Steve Carell and Tina Fey

Best foreign language film

Quentin Tarantino

Best animated feature

Gerard Butler and Jennifer Aniston

Best documentary feature

Bradley Cooper and Colin Farrell

Best cinematography

Chris Pine and Zach Quinto

Best original score & Best original song

Zac Efron and Miley Cyrus

Best art direction & Best costume design & Best makeup

Zoe Saldana and Sam Worthington

Best film editing

John Travolta and Ryan Reynolds

Best sound editing & Best sound mixing

Megan Fox and Taylor Lautner

Best visual effects

Ben Stiller

Best animated short & Best documentary short & Best live action short

Jonah Hill, Seth Rogen, Paul Rudd, Jason Segal

In Memoriam

Kathy Bates

Photo: Julia Roberts and Tom Hanks in a scene from “Charlie Wilson’s War” (2007). The two have announced plans to co-star again in another film, “Larry Crowne.” Credit: Universal.

MY 2009 ALL-SNUBBED TEAM

1 Mar

firth

single

Here is my list of the best 2009 films, directors, lead actors and actresses, supporting actors and actresses, adapted and original screenplays, and animated, documentary, and foreign language features that were not even nominated for an Oscar. (They’re in good company, too: the only list more impressive than that of Oscar-nominated films and performances is, arguably, that of Oscar-snubbed films and performances.)

I hope you’ll share your own list in the comments section below!

Best picture

  1. “A Single Man”
  2. “500 Days of Summer”
  3. “The Road”
  4. “Adventureland”
  5. “Big Fan”
  6. “Nine”
  7. “Julie & Julia”
  8. “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call — New Orleans”
  9. “The Messenger”
  10. “Is Anybody There?”

Best director

  1. Ethan Coen, Joel Coen (“A Serious Man”)
  2. Tom Ford (“A Single Man”)
  3. Pete Docter, Bob Petersen (“Up”)
  4. John Hillcoat (“The Road”)
  5. Neill Blomkamp (“District 9”)

Best actor

  1. Viggo Mortensen (“The Road”)
  2. Joseph Gordon-Levitt (“500 Days of Summer”)
  3. Ben Foster (“The Messenger”)
  4. Michael Stuhlbarg (“A Serious Man”)
  5. Nicolas Cage (“Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call — New Orleans”)

Best actress

  1. Zooey Deschanel (“500 Days of Summer”)
  2. Kristen Stewart (“Adventureland”)
  3. Emily Blunt (“The Young Victoria”)
  4. Michelle Monaghan (“Trucker”)
  5. Zoe Saldana (“Avatar”)

Best supporting actor

  1. Anthony Mackie (“The Hurt Locker”)
  2. Alfred Molina (“An Education”)
  3. Michael Caine (“Is Anybody There?”)
  4. Fred Melamed (“A Serious Man”)
  5. Zach Galifianakis (“The Hangover”)

Best supporting actress

  1. Marion Cotillard (“Nine”)
  2. Natalie Portman (“Brothers”)
  3. Melanie Laurent (“Inglourious Basterds”)
  4. Diane Kruger (“Inglourious Basterds”)
  5. Jessica Haines (“Disgrace”)

Best adapted screenplay

  1. Tom Ford (“A Single Man”)
  2. John Hillcoat (“The Road”)
  3. Nora Ephron (“Julie & Julia”)
  4. William M. Finkelstein (“Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call — New Orleans”)
  5. Scott Cooper (“Crazy Heart”)

Best original screenplay

  1. Scott Neustadter, Michael H. Weber (“500 Days of Summer”)
  2. Greg Mottola (“Adventureland”)
  3. Robert D. Siegel (“Big Fan”)
  4. Jon Lucas, Scott Moore (“The Hangover”)
  5. Pedro Almodovar (“Broken Embraces”)

Best animated feature

  1. “Mary and Max”
  2. “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs”
  3. “Ponyo”
  4. “Monsters vs. Aliens”
  5. “9”

Best documentary feature

  1. “Racing Dreams”
  2. “This Is It”
  3. “Valentino: The Last Emperor”
  4. “Tyson”
  5. “Anvil! The Story of Anvil”

Best foreign language feature

  1. “Broken Embraces” (Spain)
  2. “The Maid” (Chile)
  3. “Samson & Delilah” (Australia)
  4. “Baaria” (Italy)
  5. “Winter in Wartime” (Netherlands)

Photo: A scene from “A Single Man,” which did not receive a best picture Oscar nod. Credit: The Weinstein Company.

“BEAVIS & BUTTHEAD” MEETS “TWILIGHT” MEETS OSCARS

1 Mar

AS PURIM BEGINS/VOTING ENDS: JEWS FOR “BASTERDS”?

28 Feb

quentin-harvey

quentin-harvey

Over the past 20 years, the two closest collaborators of the writer-director Quentin Tarantino have been producer Lawrence Bender and studio chief Harvey Weinstein, both of whom are Jewish. The trio’s latest collaboration, the best picture nominated “Inglourious Basterds,” depicts the ultimate Jewish revenge-fantasy: a group of Jews kill Adolf Hitler (along with a bunch of other Nazis) before he has the opportunity to kill 6 million of them. And now, just in time for the Jewish festival of Purim (Sunday through Monday) and the close of Oscar voting (Tuesday), several rabbis from the Los Angeles area have strongly endorsed the film, arguing that it is a first-rate retelling of the story that inspired Purim.

The trend appears to trace back to Monday, November 30, 2009, when a private screening of “Basterds” was held for the Board of Rabbis of Southern California — a group composed of more than 300 rabbis from the region — followed by a Q&A with Tarantino, Bender, and actors Christoph Waltz (who plays “The Jew Hunter,” a sadistic Nazi colonel, in the film) and Eli Roth (who plays “The Bear Jew,” a sadistic Jewish warrior, in the film). The event was “sponsored” by the Jewish Journal, the Israeli Consulate, and the Southern California Board of Rabbis, and obviously appears to have had the full blessing and support of The Weinstein Company, which is distributing the film domestically.

Four days later, on December 4, 2009, Rabbi Mark S. Diamond — the Executive Vice President of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California — wrote about the event and the film on “Bloggish,” a blog on the Jewish Journal Web site. He was also the first person to connect the film to Purim:

For me, “Inglourious Basterds” is a modern-day Midrash on the Purim story. With apologies to my traditional friends, I see the Biblical Book of Esther as an ancient Jewish fable of justice and revenge. To wit, what would happen if the tables were turned and we had power over our enemies? With all the merrymaking and child-centered focus of the Purim holiday, we tend to forget that the Jews of Shushan kill 75,000 of their foes toward the end of the narrative (Esther 9:16). Then they go out and have a big party to celebrate their success.

Then, on February 20, 2010, Rabbi Judith HaLevy of the Malibu Jewish Center & Synagogue — who is also on the Board of Directors of the aforementioned Board of Rabbis of Southern California — introduced a screening of “Basterds” at her synagogue’s sanctuary, which hosts the the Malibu Film Society, a recently-established group of local cineastes (many of whom work in the film industry and some of whom are Academy members). HaLevy, with whom I spoke by phone on Saturday evening, told me that Roth was scheduled to attend the “Basterds” screening but had to cancel at the last moment.

One person who was in attendance that night was Dick Guttman, a Malibu resident and veteran publicist who has worked on Weinstein films in the past. Upon hearing HaLevy’s introduction to the film — in which she, too, connected it to Purim — she says Guttman urged her to put it into writing, suggesting that he could get it published in the Malibu Times or even on The Huffington Post. HaLevy told me she was happy to oblige and wrote a piece, entitled “Fantasy Time,” that did not end up being published anywhere but was provided to me by publicists working on the “Basterds” campaign:

This is the season of two great Jewish holidays in Malibu — the Academy Awards and the Festival of Purim. Who knew that “Inglourious Basterds,” a front-runner for top honors, is actually a classic retelling of the Purim tale? What do Nazi scalps have to do with the Purim carnival, with its rides and prizes, or children dressed as kings and queens delivering baskets of sweet-filled pastries called “hammentashen”?

It all depends on your fantasy. If you are a persecuted and oppressed people, subject to discrimination and harsh treatment for millennia, it is easy to imagine a fantasy of bloody revenge against your oppressors. The story does not have to be true to be deeply satisfying to the psyche.

The story of Purim takes place in Persia over 2,500 years ago. A foolish king (there have been so many) gives his advisor, Haman, the right to annihilate all the Jews in his kingdom, just because they are a people with their own beliefs. From this point onwards, the story moves into fantasy and farce. Esther, a beautiful Jewish maiden, takes top honors in a beauty contest and becomes Queen of Persia. Her Uncle Mordecai, watching her from outside the palace gates, overhears a plot and saves the king’s life, only to be challenged by the evil Haman. In a plot spin worthy of Moliere and Tarentino, the tables are turned. Esther saves her people, Mordecai is given the highest honors, and Haman hangs on the gallows built for Mordecai. Let’s eat!

The tale ends, however, on a darker note. In this age old revenge fantasy, once the Jews are saved, they wreak vengeance on their enemies. Not only are Haman’s ten sons hung from the gallows, but 75,000 Persians are killed in revenge. Of course, there is not a shred of evidence that this is true, but it’s a great fantasy for a people constantly forced to abandon their lands and wander in exile.

“Inglourious Basterds” is a midrash, or interpretation of this Jewish revenge story. Shoshana is our beautiful Queen Esther, and the Bear Jew clubbing his Nazi victims to death echoes the fantasy killing of 75,000 Persians so long ago. Neither story is true, but the fantasy satisfies a deep desire for the tables to be turned, the righteous to triumph, and the weak to become strong. “Inglourious Basterds” continues the tradition in fine form. Fantasy rocks! Let’s eat!

Then, last Tuesday, February 23, 2010, Rabbi Yonah Bookstein, the Executive Rabbi at JconnectLA and Director at Jewlicious Festivals — who Tweeted throughout the “Basterds” screening & Q&A for the Board of Rabbis of Southern California — wrote a post on the Jewlicious blog entitled “An Oscar for Tarantino” in which he also discussed the Purim-”Basterds” connection:

With all the buzz in LA this week about the Oscar voting, here is my vote: “Inglorious Basterds” should win best picture and many other accolades for Quentin Tarantino and his brilliant cast. “Basterds” is the most intriguing movie about WWII and the Holocaust to be made in decades.

Writing about the film this week, a few days before the holiday of Purim, I am drawn to a parallel between “Basterds” and Purim. In the Purim story, Jewish salvation came not at the hands of politicians and power-brokers, but through a Jewish woman who had hidden her identity from everyone including her husband. In “Basterds,” it is also a Jewish woman, whose past and Jewish identity are a secret, and is being romanced by a Nazi poster-boy, who is the heroine.

“Basterds” is a film about WWII and the “face of Jewish revenge” portrayed by a band of American Jews scalping Nazis behind enemy lines. There is also the Jewish woman who plots to murder the entire Nazi leadership as revenge for her murdered family. None of these things actually happened, “Basterds” is a fairy tale.

The film is brilliant from every angle. It has drama, humor, romance, and suspense. The plot twists are compelling. The story, the photography, the script, the acting, and the drama all are detailed, textured, nuanced, colorful, and captivating.

I was apprehensive. I had never seen a Tarantino film, and heard there is a lot of violence. While “Basterds” has some pretty graphic violence, it is a WWII movie after all. The scalping made everyone cringe. Yet the violence pales in comparison to portrayals of mass murder by Nazi death squads or gas chambers.

The Jews are tough in this film. More James Bond than Woody Allen, more Mossad than Seinfeld. There are no sheep being led to the slaughter. The Nazis are brutal, interesting, grotesque — not unlike the real Nazis. The leader of the Basterds played by Brad Pitt brands Nazis with Swastikas on their foreheads so they cannot escape into regular life afterward. They cannot escape what they have done.

It is clear that Tarantino did a ton of research on his subject matter. He read up on the Nazi film industry, and the war, and real life WWII spy stuff. He digested all the previously exulted WWII movies and hints of them appear in the film

I enjoyed many parts of the film for their poetic justice, suspense, and dialogue — but this one I love to retell.

Winston Churchill, when hearing of the Germans plans to replace Jewish cinema with Nazi cinema, says “You say [Goebbels] wants to take on the Jews at their own game?”

If we cannot laugh we cannot heal. If we cannot dream we cannot move on. Tarantino’s film helps us heal, and move on, but that is not why he made it — he made it because it needed to be made.

If they would have murdered Hitler, millions would have been saved, but it was not the priority of the Allied forces. In fact, the only ones that made a serious attempt at it late in the war were fellow Germans.

The Allies tried to win the war the old-fashioned way, with infantry, tanks, planes and bombs, with propaganda, cloaks, daggers and brute force. I don’t know if this was Tarantino’s goal, but Basterds shows that redemption can come from average people doing extraordinary things. To stop an evil tyrant we cannot depend solely on conventional means, and conventional players, we need to act and hope that we are helped by the hand of God.

I should also mention two other articles about “Basterds” by prominent Jews, even though neither discuss the subject of Purim. Back on August 26, 2009, Rabbi Irwin Kula penned a piece for The Huffington Post entitled “‘Inglourious Basterds,’ Vengeance And Redemption” in which he described the film as “a fun, action-packed Jewish revenge fantasy.” He also wrote, “Lawrence Bender and Harvey and Bob Weinstein deserve great credit for having the courage to back this extraordinary film. Yet, it takes a gentile to go where no Holocaust story has gone before. Personally, I would give Tarantino an honorary membership in the Jewish people (no circumcision required, as he’s been hacking, slicing and ruminating about this Jewish vengeance orgy for over a decade) for bringing consciousness of feelings and desires that many Jews could never bring up in mixed company to the screen.” More recently, on February 18, 2010, Abraham H. Foxman, a Holocaust survivor who is now the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, wrote his own piece on The Huffington Post entitled “‘Inglourious Basterds’ Should Be Recognized with An Academy Award.”

In addition to reaching out to rabbis, the folks behind “Basterds” have also reached out to Holocaust survivors and their families. On Thursday, February 4, 2010, they took out a full-page ad (copied below) in the Calendar section of the Los Angeles Times announcing a special screening of the film that night at the Museum of Tolerance and thanking Rabbi Marvin Hier and Rabbi Abraham Cooper “for their continuing support of the movie.” (Hier, a member of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California, had agreed to moderate a post-screening panel; Cooper was among the panelists.) Pete Hammond of the Los Angeles Times later reported that “the screening drew many elderly Holocaust survivors and/or family members.”

ib-ad

Bender, meanwhile, has mentioned in many interviews that he particularly appreciated Tarantino’s revenge fantasy because he faced anti-Semitism as a young Jewish kid growing up in South Jersey. For instance, on August 18, 2009, he told the Jewish Journal, “I got pushed around for being Jewish. People would call me ‘Bender kike’ and throw me up against the lockers.” And he told me last Thursday that after reading the “Basterds” script for the first time, his first words to Tarantino were: “I thank you as a fan, I thank you as a producing partner, and I thank you as a member of the Jewish tribe for writing this script.”

Incidentally, while preparing for my interview with Bender, I came across an earlier interview in which he shared a piece of information that was certainly news to me: Waltz, who portrays one of the most sadistic Nazis in film history in “Basterds,” was actually married to American-born Jew; has a son who is in rabbinical school in Israel; and has a daughter who is an Orthodox Jew.

NOTE: I am told by a person close to Tarantino that he wasn’t at all familiar with the Purim story when he wrote “Basterds” but has thoroughly enjoyed reading several of the comparisons.

Related Reading:

DEVASTATING MASH-UP: “AVATAR” v. “POCAHONTAS”

28 Feb

Randy Szuch, a 20-year-old film student, wasn’t among the first to point out the tremendous similarities between “Avatar” (2009) and “Pocahontas” (1995), but he has certainly done so in the most compelling way yet…

Last year, a similar mash-up of “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” (2008) and “Forrest Gump” (1994) certainly didn’t help the former’s best picture prospects…

IF I HAD AN OSCAR BALLOT…

28 Feb

hurtlockerscene

hurtlockerscene

JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE FOLLOWING IS HOW *I* WOULD VOTE, NOT HOW I THINK THE ACADEMY WILL VOTE.

Win count: 5 – “The Hurt Locker”; 4 – “Avatar”; 2 – “Up”; 1 – “An Education,” “The Cove,” “Crazy Heart,” “Inglourious Basterds,” “Instead of Abracadabra,” “The Lady and the Reaper,” “The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant,” “Precious,” “The Secret in Their Eyes,” “A Single Man,” “Star Trek,” “Up in the Air,” “The Young Victoria”

BEST PICTURE

  • 1. “The Hurt Locker” (Summit, 6/26, trailer)
  • 2. “Up in the Air” (Paramount, 12/4, trailer)
  • 3. “A Serious Man” (Focus Features, 10/2, trailer)
  • 4. “An Education” (Sony Pictures Classics, 10/9, trailer)
  • 5. “Avatar” (20th Century Fox, 12/18, trailer)
  • 6. “Inglourious Basterds” (The Weinstein Company, 8/21, trailer)
  • 7. “Up” (Disney, 5/29, trailer)
  • 8. “District 9” (TriStar, 8/14, trailer)
  • 9. “Precious” (Lions Gate, 11/6, trailer)
  • 10. “The Blind Side” (Warner Brothers, 11/20, trailer)

BEST DIRECTOR

  • Kathryn Bigelow (“The Hurt Locker”)

BEST ACTOR

  • Colin Firth (“A Single Man”)

BEST ACTRESS

  • Carey Mulligan (“An Education”)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

  • Christoph Waltz (“Inglourious Basterds”)

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

  • Mo’Nique (“Precious”)

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

  • Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner (“Up in the Air”)

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

  • Mark Boal (“The Hurt Locker”)

BEST ANIMATED FILM

  • “Up” (Disney)

BEST DOCUMENTARY FILM

  • “The Cove” (Roadside Attractions, 7/31, trailer)

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM

  • “The Secret in Their Eyes” (Argentina)

BEST ART DIRECTION

  • “Avatar” (Rick Carter, Robert Stromberg, Kim Sinclair

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

  • “The Hurt Locker” (Barry Ackroyd)

BEST COSTUME DESIGN

  • “The Young Victoria” (Sandy Powell)

BEST FILM EDITING

  • “The Hurt Locker” (Bob Murawski, Chris Innis)

BEST MAKEUP

  • “Star Trek” (Barney Burman, Mindy Hall, Joel Harlow)

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE

  • “Up” (Michael Giacchino)

BEST ORIGINAL SONG

  • “The Weary Kind” (“Crazy Heart”)

BEST SOUND EDITING

  • “Avatar” (Christopher Boyes, Gwendolyn Yates Whittle)

BEST SOUND MIXING

  • “Avatar” (Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson, Tony Johnson)

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS

  • “Avatar” (Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham, Andrew R. Jones)

BEST SHORT FILM (ANIMATED)

  • The Lady and the Reaper (Javier Recio Gracia)

BEST SHORT FILM (DOCUMENTARY)

  • The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant

BEST SHORT FILM (LIVE ACTION)

  • Instead of Abracadabra (Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström)

Photo: Brian Geraghty and Guy Pearce in a scene from “The Hurt Locker.” Credit: Summit Entertainment.