Thursday, December 13, 2007

GLOBES POST-MORTEM

Since I am an American, and therefore not a potential future member of the Hollywood Foreign Press, let me not equivocate: the HFPA is one of the most corrupt, pathetic, kow-towing groups of awards voters imaginable, as their nominees this morning confirmed.

This group of rank-amateur nobodies first drag every potential nominee to special screenings, Q&As, and the like, largely so they can snap a photo with the talent to later show off to their friends, and then they apparently completely disregard everything they have seen and heard and instead nominate the biggest superstars in the race so they can have a few more famous faces at their party. For instance, yes to Julia Roberts in Charlie Wilson's War, but no to Laura Linney in The Savages?!? Give. Me. A. F-ing. Break. Further, they essentially have 'friends' to whom they give advantageous treatment, which is possible due to their fairly vague rules. Nothing against Harvey Weinstein's The Great Debaters, but how much do you want to bet it finished in seventh place for Best Picture (Drama), and that that is why the category was inexplicably expanded to include seven nominees?

This morning, the HFPA proved themselves to be as irrelevant as ever when it comes to being a reliable Oscar precursor. Mark my words: the Academy Award nominations are going to look very different.I could go on here, but instead I'll share a comment or two about each category, along with my predictions score—a pretty good day, aside from Into the Wildand then I'll go back to bed. I don't need crap like this so early in the morning...

Best Picture (Drama) (5/7; missed The Great Debaters and There Will Be Blood): Mea culpa. I totally blew it on Into the Wild, which I thought would make it into their top seven, at least. Perhaps it is just too American a story? Who knows. It reminds me a bit of Crash, another story about the American experience that failed to muster even a nomination for Best Picture from the HFPA, but as we all remember was still honored by the Academy with not only a Best Picture nomination but also the big prize. Remember that unlike the HFPA, which is composed of a few dozen foreign journalists, the Academy is composed of people who actually make movies, which inherently helps contenders like Crash or Into the Wild that have large ensemble casts of well-known actors who all have friends that vote.

Best Picture Musical/Comedy) (4/5; missed Across the Universe): I have no problem with Juno, Sweeney, or Hairspray, but how do you explain the inclusion of Across the Universe, a movie that was only reviewed favorably by 52% of critics, lost at least $50 million, and most people thought died in Toronto, or Charlie Wilson's War, a movie without a third act that was rendered cute but impotent—a hollow shell of the bookby a desire to remain politically-correct and not mention Al-Qaeda or the Taliban or make any reference to the present day problems it foretold? I'm not sure what clicked with the former. I know why they bit on the latter... Mike Nichols, Aaron Sorkin, Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Emily Blunt, Amy Adams. Believe it or not, great talents can make weak movies, too...

Best Director (4/5; missed Ridley Scott for American Gangster): I guess they figured Sean Penn would show up anyway. (Seriously, though: nice job including Schnabel.)

Best Actor (Drama) (4/5; missed James McAvoy for Atonement): I picked the wrong young'n, Emile Hirsch. I could see either one or both making the cut at the Oscars.

Best Actor Musical/Comedy) (4/5; missed Philip Seymour Hoffman for The Savages): Pleased to be wrong here. Like most, I felt they would include Steve Carell (Dan in Real Life) or Jack Nicholson (The Bucket List), but apparently they actually watched The Savages... but, then again, no Laura Linney? Maybe they just picked out of a hat.

Best Actress (Drama) (5/5; missed none): Can't gloat... there were not a lot of other options to pick from, unfortunately, what with Marion Cotillard and Laura Linney going Musical/Comedy... which, retrospectively, was a mistake for both—no explanation required for Linney; for Cotillard, because Julie Christie's likely win in this category will give her momentum that might have been nipped in the bud had Cotillard taken her on directly.

Best Actress (Musical/Comedy) (4/5; missed Nikki Blonsky for Hairspray): Blonsky is a feel-good story and she has her fans, but I'm not sure she was superior to Linney, Katherine Heigl (Knocked Up), or Keri Russell (Waitress)... it looks like the movie went over really well, though.

Best Supporting Actor (5/5; missed none): I think Travolta has a solid shot at the win here... much more so than at the Oscars.

Best Supporting Actress (4/5; missed Julia Roberts for Charlie Wilson's War): In this case, I'm okay with being wrong just on general principle.

Best Screenplay (4/5; missed Aaron Sorkin for Charlie Wilson's War): At this point in the HFPA proceeding, Sean Penn longed to hear from American voters for the first time in years. (And Tony Gilroy wondered what the hell just happened to his Oscar frontrunner status.)

Best Animated Feature (2/3; missed Beowulf): With Ratatouille being the only obvious choice, they had to sit down and think for 10 or 11 seconds before realizing that they could get Jerry Seinfeld and the cast of The Simpsons to the event, and only screw one innovative movie (Beowulf) in the process. I mean, why nominate Beowulf when Jolie is already coming anyway?

Best Foreign Language Film (5/5; missed none): Leave it to me to miss one in most categories but nail Foreign Language... sheesh.

Best Original Score (2/5; missed Clint Eastwood for Grace Is Gone, Alberto Iglesias for The Kite Runner, and Howard Shore for Eastern Promises): I have no excuse for missing Howard Shore, who is a nomination-magnet, or Eastwood, who is Eastwood. I am, however, surprised they took a pass on Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood (There Will Be Blood) in favor of Iglesias.

Best Original Song (2/5; missed "Despedida" from Love in the Time of Cholera, "Grace Is Gone" from Grace Is Gone, and "Walk Hard" from Walk Hard): I stopped giving a damn when I saw they snubbed both songs from Once, which will still duke it out with "Guaranteed" at the Oscars.

Posted by Editor at 11:10:59 | Permanent Link | Comments (10) |
Comments
1 - I'll explain Across The Universe. It is a really good movie. The people who loved it, LOVED it.

The only reason it lost money is because Sony refused to market or get behind it. They had a highly public fight with Julie Taymor, and they had to be the ones that were right. I am happy for Taymor and her hard working cast because Sony threw them to the dogs.

I also believe a lot of the critics who didn't like it, didn't like it because they had already heard that there was a problem with Taymor, and that the movie was long and pretentious.... so, many went along with the status quo, as critics often do, and had already pre-judged this movie before even seeing it.

This isn't a perfect movie, but it is sure as hell better than Enchanted or Knocked Up, and I believe it deserved this recognition.

I do love this movie, and thank God it isn't the same old recycled crap! (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/13 - 16:20:03
2 - Wow...Julia hatred. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/13 - 17:08:43
3 - I agree with a lot of what you said, but I completely disagree with your thoughts about Charlie Wilson's War. I found the film to not only be charming, but also surprising hysterical. Hoffman was incredible, but the entire ensemble was pretty rock solid. I didn't feel like there was any need to mention the current state of affairs, and had there been such mention, I would probably have thought it very heavy-handed.

Most ridiculous moment: Falling Slowly snub.
 (Comment this)

Written by: Justin at 2007/12/13 - 17:20:46
4 - Whoa. You have officially become my hero. (Comment this)

Written by: Paxton at 2007/12/13 - 19:18:27
5 - I can't believe you compared Into the Wild to Crash. Into the Wild was a much better film than that vastly overrated piece of cinematic trash that does more harm than good to the issue of racism. Ugh. When a white separatist group (The National Alliance) raves about the movie, you know there's a problem. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/13 - 21:19:51
6 - Here here. The HFPA are nothing but wannabe star fuckers. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/14 - 02:21:08
7 - NO there was a 3-way tie for fifth slot. So there's the automatic assumption that The Great Debaters was last. WHATEVER! (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/14 - 03:28:00
8 - If The Great Debaters was last, then how come they didn't go with the TOP 5? Obviously there was a tie also stated in the press-release. Let me guess, you haven't EVEN seen it. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/14 - 03:49:04
9 - Scott, i have been reading you like for two years now, but today you became the finest oscar blogger i can see on the internet, the reason you are intelligent, you don't lie, and you have told us a reality that many others don't wanna see. The Golden Globes suck and they are certainly a lees than important award and it is very sad that people like Tom O'Neil make such a party about them in their pages. thank you for saying this, you are a hero. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/14 - 17:50:27
10 - Now that you've patted yourself on the back and whined like an unprofessional newcomer, pull back the drama and write something that's readable. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/12/15 - 10:57:47
Write a comment