Archive | March, 2006

A VOICE OF REASON

13 Mar

Below is an article from The Advocate web site, which caters to gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transsexuals. It is written by a homosexual named Karel who, in my opinion, has written the most eloquent and accurate analysis of why the backlash (or ‘Crash-lash’) following Crash‘s upset of Brokeback Mountain in the Best Picture is uncalled for.

While I’m not qualified to share his criticism of the gay community for not protesting Brokeback parodies, as a movie lover I do especially appreciate his candid comments on homophobia (or the lack thereof) in the Academy, as well as on the oft-ignored or -maligned merits of Crash. If you’re tired of the immature Annie Proulx sour grapes remarks (she referred to Crash as Trash), the observations that Brokeback inherently should have won because it was better reviewed by critics and awarded more precursors than Crash (even though this frequently happens), or any number of other anger-provoked criticisms, this article will be refreshing. It is nice to hear an honest and objective opinion in the wake of a week of bashing Crash, a wonderful film that dealt with a social issue of comparable importance, while still affording Brokeback the respect and credit it deserves. Thanks and props to Karel for his guts and honesty.


HOMOPHOBIA? HOGWASH!

 

Who isn’t bummed that Brokeback didn’t mosey away with the Best Picture Oscar? But if fingers must be pointed, blame the loss on gays for not standing up to endless parodies and jokes about the film

By Karel (for Advocate.com)

“And the Oscar for Best Picture goes to… Crash!”

Even before Jack Nicholson handed the naked gold statue to the movie’s producers, cries of homophobia echoed from the Kodak Theatre in Hollywood. What? No Brokeback Mountain? How could this be? There is no doubt that Brokeback was the favorite to win, and one would think a film that had just won for Best Score, Best Adapted Screenplay (go, Diana and Larry!), and Best Director would, in fact, be the Best Picture. Well, not according to Oscar.

Obvious homophobia again, right? The Academy just couldn’t stomach awarding an unashamed love story with gay sex, right? Those damn cultural elitists caved to the pressure of Middle America and the religious right and played it safe by awarding a movie about racism in the LAPD, right?

Say it with me: “Poppycock!”

That’s too easy an answer and one to which we all too often defer when things like this happen. So what happened?

First, Brokeback burnout, and for that we are all to blame. In fact, gays are probably more to blame for Brokeback not winning than almost any other group (if there is one to blame). Why? Because we allowed it to become a national joke. Oh, sure, the parodies are funny. Oh, yeah, the jokes, including Billy Crystal and Chris Rock at the beginning of the Oscar show, got laughs. But at what expense? Simple—ours.

Brokeback Mountain is a tragic story with a tragic ending. I have yet to hear anyone explain to me what is funny about two people who can never really admit they’re in love, a society that wouldn’t accept them if they did, and the possibility that one of them dies by fag bashing (oops, was that a spoiler?). It seemed like a laugh riot on paper, right?

But most gays and lesbians have allowed Brokeback parodies to flourish. Where was GLAAD when all the jokes were being made and all the clips were being produced? Oh, no, it’s cool to laugh at gay people. Look how funny they are. And the thought of gay love? Hysterical! Let’s make it a joke. In fact, in 2006, “Brokeback” became the “Hollywood Word of the Year” as reported by the nonprofit Global Language Monitor group. Hey, it’s good for the box office, right?

The problem is that Academy members may not have wanted to vote for a joke, and unfortunately that’s what the media, comics, and Hollywood have done—turned Brokeback into a giant joke, a comedy skit. It’s a shame, because Diana Ossana and Larry McMurtry’s script is anything but funny and Heath Ledger’s and Jake Gyllenhaal’s performances are worthy of praise more than parody.

And then there’s Brokeback fatigue. By the time Academy members got around to voting, they were probably tired of hearing about the movie, especially in the new, lighthearted way it’s been presented. There was no balancing voice from any gay group or organization to refocus them or the nation on how important and serious the discussions about this movie should be.

Dialogues that should be happening are not, and that’s a shame. For instance, no one stood up and said, “Stop calling this a gay movie!” Capote is far more gay than Brokeback, including the characters. I believe Ennis to be straight and the affair to be situational. What a great dialogue to have: that sexuality isn’t cut-and-dried, that sometimes you can fall in love with a person and not a gender, and that just because you’re straight and have sex with the same gender doesn’t make you gay. Just as if you’re gay and have sex with the opposite gender doesn’t make you straight. I’m legally married to a woman and haven’t had sex with anyone of any gender since July 2005. Does that make me straight? Trust me, no one believes that.

Why not talk about how being gay is a way of life, a lifestyle, an essence of being, and not about gay sex? There are gay celibates, for goodness’ sake. Straight men have gay sex. I know—I’ve had it with them. And gay men have straight sex (yes, I’ve had that too). Sexuality is complex, love is unexpected, and sometimes we enter into unexpected relationships. That’s the thing to be talking about. Talk about breaking down barriers so straight men might feel more at ease to explore their sexuality. But instead, we get a Brokeback to the Future parody—and laugh.

And then there’s the question of which nominee is simply a better movie. But gays don’t want to address that because Brokeback is a holy grail now.

Look, you can’t compare art. Van Gogh or Cézanne? And the winner is? Please, I’d take a work by both or either. Each film is unique. But in terms of complexity of story line, the way the story was told, subject matter, and all that goes in to a film, if pressed, I’m forced to admit that Crash and Capote were actually better films. I love Brokeback and all it says and does, and I can’t thank everyone enough for their labor of love, a labor that will lead to much better things in Hollywood for gays and lesbians when it comes to film. But when you compare it to the other nominees, while it certainly deserves to be nominated and deserves every single award it has gotten, was it the best picture made last year? Well, the Academy didn’t think so, and in reality, many nongay people don’t think so either. We must remove ourselves from our emotional attachment to the film and simply judge it as any other piece of celluloid. How many of you even saw Crash, Capote, or Munich? We run a very dangerous risk of blind allegiance to anything, films included.

The star of the night was Brokeback, no doubt. It got three statues. Why can’t that be enough? The fact is that 10% (or so, depending on whether or not there’s alcohol involved, or in this case, isolated men with sheep) of America loved this film. Ninety percent of America didn’t have that much of an investment, so they liked it. Many liked it a lot. But many also couldn’t relate. Racism, on the other hand? We’re still fighting that, as we have for thousands of years as humans. Everyone has a stance on that. And a troupe of talented actors weaving multiple story lines that all collide in one explosive place is not that easy of a feat. In this case the Academy thought it made for a better movie.

Brokeback Mountain is a serious, wonderful movie about serious, forbidden issues. If it’s your best picture of the year, fine. But leave Oscar alone. As an icon with no genitalia, he’s got enough problems. And not everything that happens to gay people or gay-themed products has a direct relationship to homophobia. As a mainstream talk-show host, I’ve had to learn that. We have to be more than gay; we have to be good. Being fired because you’re gay is wrong, but being fired because the straight guy next to you is just a little better at your job isn’t homophobia; it’s just a fact of life.

So the Academy didn’t think Brokeback was the brilliant work millions of others thought it to be. To scream homophobia is to yet again prove that we want to blame everything on something else and take no responsibility. Maybe if we took ourselves—and our movies—more seriously, others would too. Maybe things would be different if in our quest for acceptance, we didn’t allow ourselves or our media to become a parody. Not just on the Oscar stage, which is all make-believe anyway, but in real life.

I was fine with the Oscars. Every movie won something, and as a gay person, I’m willing to share. Congratulations to all the winners, and especially Ang Lee, Diana Ossana, and Larry McMurtry. And congratulations to Paul Haggis and his wonderful group that raised important social questions as well. We’re not the only ones struggling for equality: blacks, Hispanics, Persians, women…hell, almost every minority still is. And I’m glad Hollywood tackles it all.

Oh, and by the way, it’s an award, not a social statement. Which film won Best Picture last year? Bet you had to think, or maybe you don’t even remember. But when Crash is in the $5.50 bin at Wal-Mart or Target it will still be a great film, while Brokeback will, in fact, become a classic spoken about for many years to come. So we win after all.

Karel (Charles Karel Bouley II) is a talk-show host for KGO AM 810 in San Francisco and is heard Saturday and Sunday from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. or online at kgo.com. He is a columnist for Advocate.com and In Magazine Los Angeles, and his book of essays, You Can’t Say That, is published by Alyson Books. He maintains a blog, podcasts, and message boards at karelchannel.com and can be reached at showcomments@karelchannel.com.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH… IT’S TIME TO MOVE ON

8 Mar

Below is the text of a message I just posted on OscarWatch.com, where supporters of Brokeback Mountain have, since Sunday night, been sharing their anger, frustration, and disenchantment with the Academy’s choice of Crash as Best Picture over Brokeback. I have not wanted to fuel the flames of this debate. But too many people have made allegations that the Academy is homophobic for me to stand by any longer. Enough is enough, and I want to carefully, respectfully articulate my response to those whose feelings have been hurt by the Academy’s decision. Here is how I responded to one of those individuals, “Lee” (with some additional points also included))…

You’re asking Crash supporters to acknowledge that Brokeback lost a few votes to homophobia… fine, I do. But you have no idea how many. How about this: How many votes did Crash lose to racists? It’s a really pointless argument because it’s unquantifiable, as the Oscars have always been. We don’t know why the Academy chose Crash over Brokeback any more than we know why Dances with Wolves beat GoodFellas (or why any number of other close races turned out the way they did). I just really don’t like the ‘poor loser’ approach being adopted by Brokeback fans… I understand and appreciate the fact that this was a movie near and dear to your hearts. It’s also a movie that many who did not support it for Best Picture still enjoyed and respected. But by continuing to shove this anger and hatred in people’s faces, you really are only tarnishing the way that people will remember the film and making yourselves—and not the film’s important message—the story. To me, that’s a bigger injustice to Ennis and Jack than the Academy’s decision to support another film, which it has the prerogative to do.

The argument will go on—of that, I am certain. But I hope people will choose their words and allegations more responsibly and carefully in the future. In the heat of the moment, it is easy to get carried away with our passions. But one’s argument loses effect when it cannot be substantiated.

BREAKING NEWS: ****ING INCREDIBLE!

6 Mar

<b>BREAKING NEWS: ****ING INCREDIBLE!</b>
Even Mr. Cool himself, Jack Nicholson [left], is visibly shocked after opening the envelope to learn that Crash was the Academy’s choice for best picture over Brokeback Mountain; producers Haggis and Schulman celebrate [right]

In one of the biggest upsets in the history of the Academy Awards, Crash won best picture over Brokeback Mountain tonight. I am very happy for Crash, which I think was tremendously deserving. But here-here to Brokeback, which will certainly not be forgotten. More to come…

EARLY MORNING UPDATE

Hi again, folks. I’m still catching my breath after the Crash victory, the biggest Oscar upset in my memory — even Shakespeare in Love was less of a shock when it upended Saving Private Ryan back in 1998. To paraphrase the newly-minted best picture winner, “You thought you knew who was gonna win? You had no idea!” Well, ahem, that may be true, but…

Despite missing picture (along with most of the rest of the world, with Ebert/Roeper/Carr being major exceptions), I had my best year for predictions ever — 21 of 24 correct calls — thanks mainly to nailing the smaller categories. According to Mark Bakalor over at OscarCentral.com, this is the highest score of any critic/prognosticator this year!

Anyway, I’m very anxious to hear your thoughts on host Jon Stewart, the speeches, the messages, and the award recipients. There are two things I have no interest in hearing about:

1) the fashion

2) allegations of homophobia against the Academy

You are more than welcome to disagree with the verdict for best picture (or other categories), but baseless accusations will not be tolerated. As someone who very much enjoyed and respected both Crash and Brokeback, I think both were films worthy of best picture, and while there may be a few in the Academy who did not approve of Brokeback‘s content, Crash won on its own merits. Tonight, we honor both films and another year that brought us some horrible films… but also some that won’t soon be forgotten.

SIT BACK, RELAX, AND LAUGH

4 Mar

Well, as we all sit back and wait to see how their picks turn out, here’s a story that may bring a smile to your face. Over at The Huffington Post (huffingtonpost.com), they’ve posted ‘Movie Mashups.’ See below…

Memoirs of a 40-Year-Old Virgin Geisha
A nine-year-old is trained as a geisha in pre-World War II Japan — and then doesn’t get asked out for three decades.

Transerella Man
A Depression-era pre-op transsexual dreams of becoming heavyweight champion of the world.

Crash, and Good Luck
A racist Los Angeles cop caring for a sick father finds comfort in old black & white news footage of Sen. Joseph McCarthy.

Batman Begins to Walk the Line
The Caped Crusader falls for a vivacious country singer who disapproves of his late-night carousing and addiction to latex.

Melinda and Melinda and the Goblet of Fire
It’s part comedy, part drama — but all magic — as a troubled woman tries to complete three next-to-impossible tasks: finding a job, an apartment, and a date in Manhattan.

Crapote
A brilliant, effeminate journalist researches racial tension and road rage in Los Angeles and becomes an advocate for the death penalty for reckless driving.

Wallace & Gromit in the Curse of the Squid and the Whale
A claymation cheese-lover and his sidekick dog investigate the breakup of a disturbing marriage at the Museum of Natural History.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Brokeback Mountain
Don’t panic — it’s just two cowboys in love. Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

Mrs. Henderson Presents Munich
In World War II London, a wealthy widow assembles a crack team of nudie burlesque dancers to avenge her husband’s death.

The Chronicles of Syrianarnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Oil Company
The Pevensie children join forces with the Lion God Aslan and the bearded Bad Back Clooney to try to get gas below $2.50 a gallon.

Now, it’s your turn. Post your movie mashups in the comments…

COULD THIS MAN JOAQ THE LINE?

3 Mar

Could Joaquin Phoenix Cash in on Sunday night? Don’t be so sure you know the answer…

My friend Sasha Stone over at OscarWatch often asks us to share our most outrageous premonition, so I will preempt her doing so by going on the record now and sharing this with you… If there is to be a total shocker on Sunday night, I think it will be a Best Actor win by Joaquin Phoenix for Walk the Line. While I would never officially predict that, I think his chances have been vastly underestimated and are at least as good as Heath Ledger’s for Brokeback Mountain. That, coupled with the possibility that Hoffman’s support is being overestimated, leads me to this remark. It’s all in fun, but I can hear the comments coming already! In addition to tearing me apart in the comments section below, perhaps you’d care to share your guess of a total shocker… (and no, Jake Gyllenhaal, who seems to be the most popular nominee among this site’s readers, does not count, since he is widely believed to actually have a legitimate shot.)

LATE-BREAKING PERSPECTIVE: THINGS ACTUALLY NOT THAT CLEAR

2 Mar

As you know, I have gone final with my picks. Still, I want to share with you some buzz I’m hearing going into the last few days of the race…

BEST PICTURE
What You Know to Expect: Brokeback Mountain v. Crash
What You Should Consider: Good Night and Good Luck has a much higher number of backers than many realize; it is the less-liberal voter’s choice and it could very possibly emerge as a Pianist-like threat, which means significant but still coming up short. Munich has a loyal fan base but it’s hard to gauge just how extensive it is. Capote has gained very little traction
.

BEST DIRECTOR
What You Know to Expect: Ang Lee (Brokeback Mountain)
What You Should Consider: Even people who aren’t voting for Brokeback seem to largely be supporting Lee, who many feel is one of today’s finest directors and should have been recognized for either Sense and Sensibility (1995) or Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000). Haggis and Clooney have their loyal backers, as does Spielberg (to a lesser extent), but nobody seems to have wide enough support to really give Lee a run for his money

BEST ACTOR
What You Know to Expect: Philip Seymour Hoffman (Capote)
What You Should Consider: Hoffman seems to be in by virtue of simply being better than anyone else, but this thing is not as sign-sealed-delivered as some have implied. Ledger has a strong base of support, albeit one that apparently was weakened by his antics at the SAG Awards, intentional or not. I’m actually beginning to gather that Hoffman’s biggest threat is not Ledger but Joaquin Phoenix. Granted, Walk the Line didn’t have enough support to get a Best Pic nod over Capote, but people seem to really have embraced the performances in it, which were outstanding. Howard has a cult following, but it won’t be enough. Strathairn’s refusal to campaign and his understated performance seem to have left him out of the running.

BEST ACTRESS
What You Know to Expect: Reese Witherspoon (Walk the Line) v. Felicity Huffman (Transamerica)
What You Should Consider: Two words: Keira Knightley. People who saw her loved her, and more of them are backing her than we initially imagined. Theron and Dench are primarily regarded as two people who have been to the podium before and were essentially nominated by default as a result of a relatively weak crop. Neither has mounted any real support. So, if you aren’t crazy about Felicity or her movie (which many are not) and you’re not sure Reese is your cup of tea either, who do you vote for? Exactly. Certainly something to keep in mind.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
What You Know to Expect: George Clooney (Syriana) v. Paul Giamatti (Cinderella Man) v. Matt Dillon (Crash) v. Jake Gyllenhaal (Brokeback Mountain)
What You Should Consider: As Sasha Stone, my friend and colleague at OscarWatch, touched upon earlier today, this is the race of the night. My sense is that Giamatti’s support among fellow actors, who comprise the vast majority of the Academy electorate, will lift him over the top—he’s not a glamour boy, which actually will work to his benefit, as will some degree of sympathy for his being passed over for American Splendor and Sideways in past years. Clooney, though, has the Golden Globe and the media in his corner, as he has become the face of an Academy Awards race that has few other marquee names. I don’t believe enough people saw or liked Syriana to give it to him for the performance, and I don’t think as many people will throw him a bone in anticipation of him losing Director and Screenplay. So where does that leave us? Matt Dillon is peaking just at the right time, with a lot of people singling him out as the best thing in Crash and eating up the feel-good of his career. It is the film that poses the greatest challenge to Brokeback, so he will also get benefit from coattail support. The same can be said for Gyllenhaal, although I think to a lesser extent. He is young and has been less consistently good than the others, plus he did not benefit from sharing the screen with Ledger at his scene-stealing finest.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
What You Know to Expect: Rachel Weisz (The Constant Gardener) v. Michelle Williams (Brokeback Mountain)
What You Should Consider: Most are going with Weisz, which is the right move. Williams will only get in if Brokeback has greater support than most are perceiving. Get this—Amy Adams could be just as big a concern for Weisz, since almost everyone who watched the DVD has done nothing but rave. There is a remote possibility Keener gets in as a career nod if and only if Williams grabs some Weisz votes, but it is unlikely. Funnily enough, I think she would have got greater backing for The 40 Year Old Virgin, from what I’ve heard.