Monday, February 25, 2008

PADAM, PADAM...

The following video just came to my attentionI find to be very cute and poignant, especially in light of how things eventually turned out. Recorded on January 23, 2008, it candidly captures French actress Marion Cotillard as she nervously awaits, quietly watches, and then excitedly celebrates her Best Actress Oscar nomination for La Vie En Rose. This moment started the road to her historic Oscar win last night, and quite possibly to a long and magnificent career. Congratulations to Marion, her publicists Bryna Rifkin and Mara Buxbaum, and the entire Picturehouse team that worked tirelessly to arrive at this unlikely but obviously well-deserved outcome.

alt : http://www.youtube.com/v/WKjeaEubxag&rel=1
Posted by Editor at 22:03:21 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Friday, February 15, 2008

BAFTA UPSETS LEFT WINNERS SPEECHLESS!

Last week's British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) Awards offered us two major surprises: French-born Marion Cotillard upset hometown favorite Julie Christie (Away from Her) to win Best Actress, while British-born underdog Tilda Swinton (Michael Clayton) prevailed over presumptive front-runners and fellow Oscar nominees Cate Blanchett (I'm Not There) and Saoirse Ronan (Atonement), as well as Kelly MacDonald (No Country for Old Men) and Samantha Morton (Control).

The gorgeous-as-always Cotillard was, like most pundits, visibly shocked upon hearing her name called. Unfortunately, she was never quite able to collect herself and bumbled her way through her remarks. While this was cute for BAFTA, I hope someone has since helped her to prepare a real acceptance speech in case she pulls off the same shocker at the Oscars. Rival Christie, who is briefly shown in this clip looking on as Cotillard accepts the honor, gave a real winner of a victory speech at SAG, and—0dd as it may seemthis stuff can really count for something to some voters...

alt : http://www.youtube.com/v/6ZRDLd2BUqg&rel=1

Swinton certainly could have handled herself better, as well. Anyone who has met her knows she is a really lovely lady, but she didn't make the most favorable impression on those who have not. She was dressed in a bizarre yellow outfit that looked like a cross between a frock and a backpack and made her journey to the podium a bit tedious. She offered some jokes that didn't really make sense. And then, worst of all, she thanked her agent above all others and promised to give him the statue that had just been bestowed upon hernot the most endearing, heart-warming sentiment one can share in such a moment. (Afterward, she also volunteered some information about her personal life that Sasha Stone enjoyed, but that are undoubtedly going to weird out more Academy members than they turn on.)

alt : http://www.youtube.com/v/7_DgP50YWrs&rel=1

So where do these two super-talented actresses go from here? Does a BAFTA win indicate that there are similar groundswells with the Academy? It's possible. I think an Oscar win by Cotillard would be more deserved but less likely than one by Swinton, but we shall see...

Posted by Editor at 03:24:28 | Permanent Link | Comments (3) |

Friday, February 01, 2008

MARION COTI-YOWZERS!

There has been much discussion about the obstacles in the way of a Best Actress win for Marion Cotillard (La Vie En Rose). To name just a few: she is the least familiar name and face among the nominees in her category; she is being considered for a movie from France that features subtitles; and her movie is not nearly as great as her performance within it. Additionally, it is extremely rare for a foreign actor in a foreign language film to win an acting Oscar—only two, Sophia Loren (Two Women) and Roberto Benigni (Life Is Beautiful), have previously managed the feat. Naturally, this begs the question: Is there any reason to believe Cotillard could make three? I think there might be...

Amidst the flurry of discussion about presumptive front-runners Julie Christie (Away from Her) and Ellen Page (Juno), I think we are forgetting there are also a number of key points in her favor...

  1. She is a stunningly beautiful young woman (see this sexy clip sent in by a reader) portraying a jarringly unattractive character—keep in mind that the Academy seems to love nothing more than attractive women de-glamourizing themselves for serious roles (consider the recent Oscar wins of Roberts, Kidman, Berry, Theron, Mirren, etc.).
  2. She is the star of a bio-pic about a well known, complex, real person, and we know how much the Academy loves to reward those sorts of performances (consider the recent Oscar wins of Swank, Roberts, Kidman, Theron, Witherspoon, Mirren, etc.), especially when it comes to musicians (Spacek, Lange, Witherspoon)
  3. At thirty-two, she is precisely at the average age of Best Actress winners, unlike her two main rivals—Christie would be much older than usual at 66 (and also already won an Oscar back when she was 24), and Page would be much younger at 21 (she'll turn that age on the 21st)
  4. Even though Christie won the SAG Award, she and Cotillard both won Golden Globes, and by my count Cotillard is very competitive with Christie and Page for the lead of most honors from key critics and awards groups
  5. She has the admiration of her peers. Consider the following praise...
    • Cate Blanchett: "Marion Cotillard in La Vie En Rose was absolutely astonishing, and the synthesis of the performance with the whole film is superb. As much as inhabiting Piaf, she was also creating a creature, and I thought that was astonishing and inspiring... one of the most remarkable things I've ever seen."
    • Ryan Gosling: "Not only did she craft a flawless impersonation of a famous personality, but Marion's humanity elevated her performance to a devastatingly honest and yet seemingly effortless personifcation of integrity and grace. To me,this is more than just a great performance; it's a document of this actress' overwhelming ability to love."
    • Keira Knightley: "I think that's one of the most extraordinary performances I've ever seen."
    • Oprah Winfrey: A "transcendent performance."
    • Forest Whitaker [asked who he expects to hand the Oscar to]: "Marion Cotillard! Did you not see her in La Vie En Rose? She's transforming! That's it!"

So, can Cotillard follow in the footsteps of Simone Signoret (A Room at the Top) and Juliette Binoche (The English Patient) and become just the third native of France to win an acting Oscar? To quote Henry Fonda in Twelve Angry Men, "I'm not saying yes. I'm just saying it's possible!"

(See: ATWI... INTERVIEW with Cotillard.)

Posted by Editor at 04:03:31 | Permanent Link | Comments (9) |

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

THE NOMINEES CALL IN!

Amy Ryan, who earned a nomination for Best Supporting Actress this morning (her first) for her performance as Helene McCready in Gone Baby Gone and is a favorite to take home the Oscar, got in touch at 10:28am PST/1:28pm EST...

alt : /javascript/audio-player/player.swf?soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Famadeo.blog.com%2Frepository%2F177540%2F2823663.mp3

Ellen Page, who earned a nomination for Best Actress this morning (her first) for her performance as Juno MacGuff in Juno and is a favorite to take home the Oscar, called in at 10:11am PST/1:11pm EST...

alt : /javascript/audio-player/player.swf?soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Famadeo.blog.com%2Frepository%2F177540%2F2823579.mp3

Charles Ferguson, who earned a nomination for Best Documentary this morning (his first) for his Iraq post-mortem No End in Sight (his first film) and is a favorite to take home the Oscar, gave a ring at 9:14am PST/12:14pm EST...

alt : /javascript/audio-player/player.swf?soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Famadeo.blog.com%2Frepository%2F177540%2F2823488.mp3

Marion Cotillard, who earned a nomination for Best Actress this morning (her first) for her performance as Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose and is a favorite to take home the Oscar on the heels of her Golden Globe win, rang up at 8:08am PST/11:08am EST...

alt : /javascript/audio-player/player.swf?soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Famadeo.blog.com%2Frepository%2F177540%2F2823263.mp3
Posted by Editor at 12:20:34 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Saturday, December 01, 2007

ATWI... INTERVIEW SERIES

TOUR DE FORCE!

THE PERFORMANCE OF MARION COTILLARD AS FRENCH ICON EDITH PIAF IN LA VIE EN ROSE IS NOT JUST ONE OF THE BEST OF 2007, BUT EVER. NOW, MEET THE WOMAN BEHIND THE MAGIC...


Where were you born and raised?
I was born in Paris. And when I was about eleven I was living in the suburbs, and then we moved in the countryside. And I have two brothers—are twins. And my parents are actors on stage—both of them. So I lived in that artistic atmosphere as a child.

What sorts of things were you interested in as a child? Did you always aspire to be an actress?
Well, as long as I can remember, I always wanted to be an actress. And I loved—and I still love—artistic things. I mean, it’s how I can express myself. I love to sing, I love to dance, I love to do some painting and sculpture, even if I’m not very good at it. But I really love to do this.

You mention singing. I’ve heard that long before you lip-synced to Edith Piaf, you were lip-syncing to Madonna…
[laughs] Yes, I was lip-syncing my favorite singers when I was a child. But it was not, like, very technical lip-sync, as it was for Piaf, of course.

As far as acting, how did you learn the craft? Did you ever have formal training, or did you learn from observation?
Well, no, I started to take lessons—it’s not a good way to say this, because it’s not really lessons but, like, training—when I was fourteen. I think I started when I was fourteen, maybe earlier. And both of my parents taught me—or, I would say, helped me to reveal—what I had inside, what I have inside. So they were my first teachers, my first guides, I would say.

I’d like to mention a few of the films in which you appeared before La Vie En Rose, and I hope you can just share a thought or two about the parts you played in them and what they meant to your career. The first one is Lilly Bertineau in the Taxi movies…
Ah, yes. Well, it was the first time I was in a very successful movie, and so it was a beautiful meeting, I would say, with a big audience, because it was very successful. At that time, I was still wondering, you know—you know, you expose yourself in front of people—do you really have the right to expose yourself like this? Do you really have something to say that is strong enough to have the right to be in the light. Well, I was very young, and I had all those questions in mind. It was an interesting period—that I was searching myself in that business.

The next one is Josephine in Big Fish
Well, that was a dream. Tim Burton is one of my favorite directors. He’s my idol. And to have the opportunity to meet him was something huge for me, as a French actress. And to work with him was something I couldn’t believe. So it was one of the first amazing experiences—an experience where you have the particles in your eyes and in your body, you know, doing what you’re passionate for, and with someone who gave me the desire to be an actress. Because Tim Burton is really part of, you know, what drove me to be an actress.

The next one is from a very good movie, Tina in A Very Long Engagement
Yeah. That’s one of my favorite roles. It’s very funny because I was shooting Big Fish at the time when I got the offer from Jean-Pierre Jeunet, and I was playing that very sweet and nice mother-to-be in Big Fish, and I had the desire to express anger on my next movie, but I didn’t know what would it be at that time. But I had that desire to express anger in a movie, and then Tina Lombardi came my way, and it was exactly what I needed to express at that time. And working with Jean-Pierre Jeunet—I really love his inner-universe, because he has, like Tim Burton, a very, very strong way to see things. And it was an amazing experience. And I’m in love with Tina Lombardi.

The last one I’ll mention before La Vie En Rose is the one for which you were best known in America before Edith Piaf, Fanny in A Good Year
Yes. I had the opportunity to meet Ridley Scott, who is a genius. Well, it was a simple story. And, again, it was something that I needed to express—a simple love story about people who think a way and then realize, at a point, that it’s not their real life, and they have the courage to change their way. And I think it’s a beautiful thing to do.

Living in France, where Edith Piaf was such a national icon that her funeral in 1963 stopped traffic in Paris for the first time since the end of World War II, you must have been familiar with her from an early age. Before the film, did you know much about her or enjoy her music?
Well, of course I knew Piaf, as a French citizen, but I didn’t know anything about her life. I knew a few songs—while I didn’t know that many things about her, I loved a few songs. And sometimes, when I’m working on a movie, I use music to help me to get a certain emotion, and some of Piaf’s songs were on my list of music that I used to work. So I was very, very familiar with some of her songs, because it helped me on other movies, too.

Olivier Dahan has said that he wrote the script about Piaf with you in mind before you even knew about it. How did you find out that he wanted you?
Well, very early in the process, my agent called me, and he told me that Olivier Dahan just started to write a script about Piaf’s life, and that he was thinking about me. So, at that time, you know, the script wasn’t written yet. Well, it’s always something when someone thinks of you for a role, and especially when he writes thinking of you. And then I think it was a year later when the script was ready. They sent me the script, and then I met Olivier. I hadn’t met him before.

I believe there is a funny story about how you met him at a bar near the cemetery where Piaf is buried…
Yes! It’s funny, because I used to live not so far from the cemetery, but I made a mistake, giving him an address of a bar which was La Mer Lachaise, and I told him La Pere Lachaise, which is just near the cemetery. So I arrived quite late—because I was waiting for him in the wrong place—and so I ran to the meeting, where he was. And it was just in front of the cemetery, so it was kind of funny. And when I met him for the first time, there was something very natural, very normal in the fact that I was there with him talking about Piaf. I’d just discovered her life at that point, because I had just read the script. And it was something obvious, that we were here together, talking about this.

Did he give you any indication of what had made him think about you for the part right away?
Well, not at that time. But because we did some interviews together to promote the movie when it was finished—the movie was done and about to be released—he told a journalist, because the journalist asked the same question. And he told that the first picture he saw of Piaf—the picture that gave him the desire to do a movie about Piaf—he saw something similar in her eyes and mine. And also he said that he thought that I had—how can I say this?—an ability to play tragedy. I don’t know if it’s the right way to say this? And that it was something interesting for Piaf, the character.

Who is Pascal Luneau , and how was he able to help you?
Pascal Luneau—I worked with him on two movies a few years ago. When I started working, I felt that I needed to be helped by someone, to help me find things inside me, and his name came right away in my mind. I mean, it was obvious for me that I had to work with him, because I knew that he would guide me. He knows me, and I knew that he would know how to—sorry, it’s kind of hard to express—but I didn’t want to do what I would call a ‘classical way’ to discover a character, especially because I play her from nineteen to forty-seven, so I would have to play an old woman. And I didn’t want to rehearse some scenes of the script. I didn’t want to find the outside—find the way she talked, the way she moved. I really wanted to understand her. And I didn’t try to look like her or to sound like her—of course, I wanted it to be close to her, but I didn’t try to imitate. So I never experienced the voice or the body language before being on the set. I watched her a lot—the movies she did as an actress, the personal footage, the TV interviews, all these. I listened to her a lot, of course. I fed myself with her. And the most important thing for me was to understand who she was.

I read that you made a deliberate decision, when you were preparing to play Piaf, not to speak with people who knew her. Why was that?
Oh, no, no, no—I didn’t make that decision. I mean, I didn’t feel right away that I needed to meet people, but actually I met some people. I met two people who really helped me understand a lot of things about her. I met Georges Moustaki, who wrote ‘Milord,’ and who was one of her lovers. And I met Ginou, who was her best friend for fifteen years, and she really opened her heart and a part of her life for me in a very generous way, and she really helped me and supported me in all the process.

Can you describe the different sorts of makeup that were used to help you perfect the appearance of Piaf at different stages of her life, and how long it to apply them? I imagine it was quite an ordeal for you to go through…
Yes. [laughs] It was very hard, because we had to find several makeups. When she’s nineteen, and when she’s thirty, it was kind of easy—because it was the youngest part, it was kind of easy. And then, when she’s forty, and when she’s forty-five, and when she’s forty-seven, it was kind of hard to transform a thirty-year-old woman into a forty-seven-year-old woman who looked almost seventy at that time. The different makeup would take from three hours when she is forty, like four hours when she is forty-five, and five hours when she is very, very old—even if she was not that old, but at the end, with the red hair. And, yeah, it was five hours. But the thing is I slept—almost all the makeup session, I was sleeping. [laughs] So it was not so—well, it was kind of weird, because you have all those smells like alcohol, latex, acrylic painting, and it would go into my dreams, and I had very, very weird dreams during all those makeup sessions.

That’s funny! And prosthetics? They used some prosthetics as well, right?
Yes. They used prosthetics on the cheeks and—ah, I can’t remember how to say this, ‘le menton’—well, under the head?

The chin?
Yeah, the chin! The chin. Just under the chin. And a lot of latex. And, for the last part, I had a bald cap, and then a wig with very few red hair.

And is it true you shaved back your own hairline, as well?
Yes. I shaved my eyebrows and my hairline, because she had a very, very big front, so to make it bigger we shaved. [laughs]

The next thing I want to ask you about is the singing. Although you appear to be singing in the film, the voice we hear, from what I understand, is that of either Piaf, from recordings, or Jil Aigrot, who performed Piaf songs that were not recorded…
Exactly.

What sort of preparation did you do in order to make it seem so believable that you were singing, when in fact you were really lip-syncing to their voices?
Well, it was a very, very important point for me, the lip-sync. I was very, very worried, because I saw many movies with lip-sync, and it’s very rare when it’s well done. Because it’s a very, very difficult thing to get. So I watched all the movies I remembered I saw with lip-sync in it which were not good, to try to understand why it was not good. And then I understood that. The whole body is involved in the lip-sync. The tiniest movement will change the sound. And I realized that the silence was almost more important than the words; that the way you breathe is very, very important in the lip-sync. Basically, everything—every tiny movement of the body—is very important. And then, well, I rehearsed for hours and days in order to be almost perfect technically, to be able to let myself go to the interpretation of the song.

You videotaped yourself, right?
Yes, I did this. Well, the first thing is that it’s very interesting, because you find your own language. You have to write the silence and the breathing with some letters, like ‘h,’ ‘f,’ you know—the way you breathe, you find your own way to write this down. So it’s kind of funny but, at a point, it’s almost the same thing, so you always have to be very accurate and repeat again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again ‘til it’s almost perfect. I really had to believe that I was singing when I watched the recording of myself. It was the hardest part of the whole project, actually.

Although you lip-sync the songs, the speaking voice is yours, but it doesn’t really sound like you do now. I’ve read that you did certain things with your voice in the mornings to achieve this different sound…
Yes. I mean, all the songs were from Piaf, and she had a very special speaking voice, so I really had to find inside me the voice of the character. And by singing every morning, I managed to lower my voice and to find a way to sound like the songs. So, yeah, I sang a lot. But she sang every day of her life! So I knew that it was a good way to make a contact with the character.

As we’ve discussed, you play Piaf at different stages of her life. Were those stages filmed in sequence, or did the shooting schedule make it so you had to jump back-and-forth between the different ages? If that’s what you did, that must have been very challenging…
Well, when I saw the schedule, and I saw that it was really back-and-forth, and that my fourth day of shooting was a sequence from 1963—when she says that she will cancel The Olympia and that guy comes and plays ‘Non Je Ne Regrette Rien’ for her—when I saw that that was like the fifth day of shooting, I was like, “Okay, it’s the big jump right away. Now, I’m freaking out.” It was not following the script, but it was like the script, back-and-forth. After two weeks, we had been doing all the periods and—well, I found my place in all the periods. I really had a great pleasure to play all the periods. And so I realized that it was, at the end, the best way to not freak out—for example, if we had waited for the end to shoot all the oldest part, I would have waited with so much fear that maybe it would have, like, stuck me into fear. But because, I mean, I had to jump right away, well, I did. And then, after this, it was kind of easy to jump from a period to another. And I have to say that after, like, four, five, or six days—I mean, a week—of forty-seven years old, I was so happy to be young again! [laughs] And I remember telling my friends, “Oh, I’m so happy I’m young today!” [laughs] Because I’d been old for, like, ten days, and I’m so happy I’m young again. So it was perfect—it was the perfect schedule, actually. It would have been harder if we would have shot like in in-time.

I’d like to ask you about are few scenes from the film that particularly stand in people’s memories. For instance, the scene in which she learns that her lover Marcel has been killed and somehow ends up performing in front of an audience; or the scenes in which she’s an old woman in California; or the last scene, which you referred to, in The Olympia Theater. Can you talk about what it was like to make these most memorable scenes?
Well, the death of Marcel Cerdan was very special because it’s only shot—it’s like five minutes. You start the sequence and you go through the end. It was a very special day. Because it’s only one shot, you have to be very, very concentrate—everybody has to be very, very concentrate—on what they are doing, what we are doing, because if you do a mistake after three minutes, you have to do the whole thing again. And because it’s very emotional, and there’s many motions to go through in only five minutes, everybody had to really be together. So it created a very special atmosphere and, well, it was one of the most beautiful days—even if all the days were beautiful during all the shooting, this day was very special. And it was like a dance of all the actors, and the crew, and the camera—it was really sort of a dance. And it represents her life, too. I mean, she’s happy in the morning—really happy—and then the tragedy—the huge tragedy—but, at the end, she will be on stage. So it’s like her life in five minutes. So it was a very, very special scene. The scene on the beach was very, very special, too, because it was the last scene. It was the last day of shooting; we ended with that sequence, the interview. So I was very—well, it was the end. I had spent months of my life with her, and that was it, that was the end, so it was very special because of this. And The Olympia? Well, we were in the real Olympia, and she saved the Olympia several times—it was her place. And after three months and a half that we were shooting in Prague, we had just got back to Paris, so all the people in the extras were French—they knew Edith Piaf, so it was kind of special, too. And Ginou was there, so that was very, very special, and she supported me. She’s an amazing person; really, I love her.

The film has been a great box-office hit in France. Even decades after Piaf’s death, people are still fascinated by her. What do you think she represents to the French people?
She represents someone who is very, very close to people, because she lived so many things, she had so many experiences that she knows people—she knows people from the streets, she knows people from the artistic life, she knows politicians, you know? She knew all kinds of people, and she knew very well how to tell people’s stories, and to share the those emotions of people, and to give them back those emotions through her. So she was very, very close to people.

As you are surely aware, you’re currently favored by most people to win the Academy Award for Best Actress. I know it may be uncomfortable to talk about, but I wonder how this sort of discussion makes you feel. Does it make you feel nervous? Does it make you feel excited? What goes through your mind?
Well, I’m not nervous. I’m really enjoying every minute of that adventure. We went from surprise, to another surprise, to another surprise, and another surprise, and I’m so happy for the movie. I’m so happy for the work we’ve done all together—with Olivier, with the photographer, with the makeup artist, with all the crew. And I’m very happy to have the opportunity to share that movie with people I admire, especially in the United States. I’m a child of American cinema. My heroes as a child were Charlie Chaplin and the Marx Brothers, and my favorite movies were Singin’ in the Rain and Annie. So to have the opportunity to share that movie we are so proud of in that country of cinema? It’s something that I really enjoy.

And, just very quickly, there are a lot of people, like myself, who look forward to seeing more of you. I understand you have some exciting film projects in America, including one that will allow you to use your voice—is that correct?
It’s correct! When the strikes will be over. [laughs]

Just so people know, which is that?
It’s Rob Marshall’s project, Nine.

Posted by Editor at 15:44:53 | Permanent Link | Comments (2) |

Monday, July 09, 2007

THIS WEEK'S BRIEFING

  • Spielberg on Spielberg, the latest original documentary from Turner Classic Movies, will have its world premiere on the network tonight--Monday, July 9, 2007--at 8pm EST. I just watched a screener of the program, which essentially is an extended interview of director Steven Spielberg by Time film critic Richard Schickel in a screening room on the Universal lot, intercut with clips from his most famous films. Consdering Schickel's usual depth, the film is a bit disappointing, and far from the best thing to come out of TCM recently--their Brando special holds that distinction, in my opinion. It is strangely constructed, with films sporadically shown out of order and oddly-titled chapter headings unnecessarily separating them. Worse, it brings very little new information to the table--most of the director's anecdotes and scenes in the film are already familiar to even casual film buffs. And, considering that TCM specializes in championing classic movies--doing a magnificent, heroic job with that, I should add--it seems odd that the network would commission a documentary about a director still very much in the game. One almost gets the sense that Schickel decided on his own to interview Spielberg, and only subsequently took it to TCM in order to find a forum in which showcase it. None of this is to say it is a bad film, only that it leaves something to be desired--a missing piece that perhaps can only be supplied with a greater distance of time from the director's undeniably magnificent films. What it does best, in its opening minutes, is give a sense of Spielberg 'the man'--as opposed to the incomparably talented director--and the great drive and passion that burns beneath his outwardly serene demeanor. That makes it worth a look.
  • The latest documentary from maverick filmmaker Michael Moore may be his most widely-appealing yet. Sicko is an extraordinary, gripping, scary film about the origins and workings of the American health care system, the millions it leaves behind, and alternative systems in other nations--England, France, and yes, even Cuba--that serve their populations much more effectively. While Moore's films always stir up controversy, Sicko should not split audiences along party lines, but rather draw the attention of every American to an issue that, in an instant, can surpass terrorism, homeland security, border protection, and any other issue as the most important in their lives. How can a 79 year old man be forced to work full-time as a janitor in order to pay for his wife's medicine? How can a man who accidentally saws off his middle and ring finger be forced to choose which one to have reattached? How can the al Qaeda terrorists being held at Guantanimo Bay receive better health care than the emergency responders who incurred severe respiratory problems responding to the al Qaeda attacks of 9/11? How can this happen in America? Michael Moore is on the case--never allowing himself to overshadow the issue--and has arguably made his best film yet.
  • I've been fortunate enough to interview many film people who I greatly admire and enjoy, but I'm having an unusually hard time containing my excitement for a conversation that I have scheduled for Tuesday with Leslie Nielsen, the legendary star of several of the funniest movies of all time, including Airplane! (1980) and The Naked Gun (1988). Surely I can't be serious? I am... and don't call me Shirley. Nielsen, who is now a peppy 81 years old, has been gracious enough to agree to speak with me for my ongoing book project, in which I hope to interest younger people in older movies. Many will be surprised to learn that Nielsen had a very respectable career as a serious actor in films like Forbidden Planet (1956), Ransom! (1956), and The Poseidon Adventure (1972) before the Zucker-Abrams-Zucker spoofs came along and tagged a few decades on to this career. More on this to come following the chat.
  • I just realized that I neglected to post my thoughts following the press screening a month ago of potential awards contender La Vie En Rose, a film about the troubled life of iconic French singer Edith Piaf, whose most famous song shares the title of the film. Roger Ebert, the critic I most respect, fell in love with the film and calls it "one of the best bio-pics I've seen. " To me, it's not that simple. I think it is a tremendously flawed bio-pic with one of the best performances I've seen, which makes for a more difficult equation. One could not ask for a better performance as Piaf than the one delivered by the stunningly beautiful French actress Marion Cotillard, who was previously best known for playing Russell Crowe's love interest in the shortlived A Good Year (2006). Hers is the definition of a gutsy undertaking. Piaf, at her best, was less than stunning, and later in her life, when decades of abusing alcohol and drugs to drown away her sorrows caught up with her (along with cancer), she looked frighteningly older than her years. Cotillard has allowed the makeup department to recede her hairline, widen her eyes, and wrinkle her face, but has also taken on much of the physical transformation herself, adopting Piaf's hunched back, grand gestures during performance and, perhaps most vitally to the success of the movie, seamlessly lip-syncs to Piaf's music, which humbly allows the audience to hear the timeless music and lyrics that no actress could imitate. All of this results in a transformation as stunning as any since Charlize Theron in Monster (2003). So what is there not to like? Most of the things that are beyond Cotillard's control. Sitting through this movie is almost like stepping into a boxing ring with your hands tied behind your back--you feel helpless as you take punch after punch to the gut. We are introduced to Piaf as a neglected child, a sympathetic character. Typically, there would be an arc to the rest of the story, both emotionally and structurally. Instead, there is neither. The audience is exposed to two hours of tragedy after tragedy in this woman's life, and not necessarily in chronological order, which only confuses the situation. We barely have time to finish reacting to one tragedy before the next is thrust upon us! True, Piaf's life was tragic, and chaotic, and fast-paced, and over all too soon... but these, alone, do not a good movie make! Perhaps some lives do require the creative liberties that filmmakers are often criticized for taking. Perhaps some lives are not adaptable for the screen at all. That said, it can be nearly impossible to resist dissecting the lives of high-profile people like Piaf, who touched and continue to touch so many other lives. We want to understand the person. But sometimes the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, and it can be a fruitless endeavor to try to understand a life by focusing on a few of its turning points--"Rosebud," anyone? What we have here is a grand E! True Hollywood Story, the story of someone who came out of nowhere and nothing to touch the hearts of a nation, all the while seeking happiness that would forever elude her. Now for the inevitable question: Can Cotillard's performance--boosted by some good reviews--overcome the film's downer feel, subtitles, and--perhaps its biggest obstacle--early release date, in order to be around during the awards season late in the year? It is a possibility, but I'm guessing no. Cotillard's situation brings to mind Gretchen Mol's candidacy for The Notorious Bettie Page last year--undeniably worthy, but too small and eventually drowned out by the higher-profile performances that take over theaters beginning around October. C'est La Vie, non?
  • Finally, I thought I'd pass along an email I received from a friend with a story that raises an interesting question:

"Don't know whether you heard about this, but Denzel Washington and his family visited the troops at Brook Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas (BAMC) the other day. This is where soldiers who have been evacuated from Germany come to be hospitalized in the United States, especially burn victims. There are some buildings there called Fisher Houses. The Fisher House is a hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in the Hospital. BAMC has quite a few of these houses on the base, but as you can imagine they are almost filled most of the time. While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave him a tour of one of the Fisher Houses. He asked how much one of them would cost to build. He then took his check book out and wrote a check for the full amount right there on the spot. The soldiers overseas were amazed to hear this story and want to get the word out to the American public, because it warmed their hearts to hear it. The question I have is why do Alec Baldwin, Madonna, Sean Penn, and other Hollywood types make front page news with their trash and Denzel Washington's patriotism doesn't even make page 3 in the Metro section anywhere except the local newspaper in San Antonio?"

Posted by Editor at 01:34:54 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Friday, June 01, 2007

THIS WEEK'S BRIEFING


Michael Moore promoting Sicko, his new documentary, which was a big hit at Cannes

  • If you're looking for a good laugh this weekend, go out and see Judd Apatow's latest comedy, Knocked Up, which opens today and is far and away the funniest movie of the year so far. You may remember that I loved it when I saw it at a screening about a month ago... having just rewatched The 40 Year Old Virgin, I'm ready to go see Knocked Up again. For some fascinating added perspective about the crazy-like-a-fox minds behind these movies, check out 'Judd Apatow's Family Values,' a lengthy cover piece about the director from last week's New York Times Magazine; 'The Education of a Comic Prodigy,' a profile of star Seth Rogen by Joel Stein in the May 17 Time magazine; and 'Knocked Up Delivers Old-Style Comedy,' a review of the film by Richard Schickel in today's Time magazine in which the sometimes snobby critic refers to this film as 'a small and welcome miracle'; and, perhaps most impressive of all, 'Bye-Bye, Bong. Hello, Baby,' a review of the film by A.O. Scott in today's New York Times in which the esteemed critic says the film 'strikes me as an instant classic.' (In the interest of equal time, check out a less enthusiastic review of the film by someone whose opinion I respect, Peter Keough of The Boston Phoenix.) To me, the question is less whether the public will like this film than whether they will turn out to see it--we'll have to wait until Monday to see whether or not the box-office delivers a hit... or a stillborn.
  • The 60th annual Cannes Film Festival came to a close this week with the Golden Palm being awarded to the Romanian film 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days, directed by Christian Mungui. The Ethan and Joel Coen (Fargo) film No Country for Old Men, which stars Javier Bardem, Tommy Lee Jones, Josh Brolin, and Woody Harrelson, was reportedly hot on its heels. The bigger Cannes winner, however, may be Sicko, the latest documentary from controversial director Michael Moore, who elected to screen the film out-of-competition, having previously been awarded a special prize for Bowling for Columbine (2002) and won the Golden Palm for Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004). Even Roger Friedman, the gossip columnist/film commentator for right-wing Fox News, called it "brilliant and uplifting." (For another interesting perspective on the Cannes awards, check out the 'Palm d'Hoberman'--as in J. Hoberman of The Village Voice.)
  • Changing subjects from a French film festival to a French language film, I will be seeing a press screening of La Vie En Rose on Tuesday. Marion Cotillard, Russell Crowe's love interest in A Good Year (2006), stars in this biopic of Edith Piaf, the popular WWII era French singer who may be best known for the song that is the title of this film. It has been rumored that Cotillard gives an awards-worthy performance, although an early release date (it has a slow rollout beginning June 8) and foreign language are always tough to overcome.
  • On Wednesday, I will be heading out to Los Angeles to conduct several interviews for a book project, accompanied by my friend Harley Yanoff, a young actor who recently starred in a small indie called Remedial Attraction (2006) and will be appearing as one of Kevin Spacey's college students in the upcoming 21 (2008). While the days will be busy with work, we're slightly concerned that the city's nightlife will have collapsed, what with Lindsay Lohan checking into rehab and Paris Hilton checking into jail this week; alas, we have faith that L.A. will somehow find a way to go on. Among the film folk with whom I'll be speaking: A.C. Lyles, an executive at Paramount Pictures who has worked at the studio since 1928, on the studio lot; Corey Allen, best known as James Dean's rival whose car goes off the cliff in Rebel Without a Cause (1955); Carla Laemmle, niece of Universal Pictures founder Carl Laemmle, who utters the opening lines in Dracula (1931) and is the sole survivor of that film and The Phantom of the Opera (1925); Marsha Hunt, a popular M-G-M actress who was blacklisted and ruined by the House Un-American Activities Committee; my friend Peter Ford, the son of the late, great actor Glenn Ford; and several others who I will be able to discuss later. I might also check out the Student Academy Awards, which have previously been won by the likes of Spike Lee and Robert Zemeckis, and will be handed out on June 9.
  • Speaking of Lindsay Lohan, the young actress was supposed to begin shooting the dark indie comedy Poor Things on Thursday but, having been forced into rehab by her latest vehicular mishap, many speculated that she would be replaced. Instead, Shirley MacLaine (The Apartment, Terms of Endearment), the film's legendary star and co-producer (along with Rob Hickman), announced that they will rearrange their shooting schedule in order to wait for Lohan.
  • My home state, Connecticut, is generating some impressive visitors from the world of film, thanks to recently passed tax incentives that give a 30% tax rebate to filmmakers who spend more than $50,000 in the state. (My friend Carl Feen, a major player in the Connecticut Democratic Party, played a key role in making this happen.) Last summer, chunks of In Bloom (starring Uma Thurman) and 2007 awards contender Reservation Road (starring Joaquin Phoenix) were shot in Connecticut. This summer, Indiana Jones IV comes to the Yale University area of downtown New Haven, probably since Indy's son (Shia LeBouf) will be a college-age student, and Revolutionary Road, which reunites Titanic mates Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet (and Kathy Bates), will begin shooting in Stamford in about three weeks. (All 'Roads' lead to Connecticut?) Here are some photos of Leo and Kate from the set.
  • John Travolta is reportedly 'remarkable' as a grossly-obese woman in the upcoming big-screen adaptation of John Waters' play Hairspray.
  • Variety has put an end to thirteen years of rumors by confirming that The Women, the classic American 'women's weepie' from 1939 that starred Norma Shearer, Joan Crawford, Rosalind Russell, Mary Boland, Paulette Goddard, Joan Fontaine, Marjorie Main, and Ruth Hussey, among others, will be re-made with Meg Ryan, Annette Bening, Eva Mendes, Jada Pinkett-Smith, Candice Bergen, and Debra Messing, all of whom "have either signed or are near committing." The first one is worth seeing, if only to hear the bitchy Joan Crawford line, "There is a name for you ladies, but it isn't used in high society--outside of a kennel."
  • The screening room: Just watched Hell's Angels (1930), Howard Hughes' passion project about WWI British aviators, which is notable for its great stuntwork (three pilots died during shooting) and an early performance from troublemaking blonde bombshell Jean Harlow (including the only eight minutes in which she ever appeared in color)... King Vidor's adaptation of Ayn Rand's controversial novel The Fountainhead (1949) today comes across as too preachy and repetitive, and its 'go it alone' and 'stay the course at all costs' mottos have been hurt by George W. Bush and Iraq, but it is interesting to see the beginning of the Gary Cooper-Patricia Neal affair. Neal, who I recently met with, was never sexier (or more sadistic) than in this film... The 39 Steps (1935) is an early film from Alfred Hitchcock, and features most of his usual trademarks--sabotage, secret agents, ordinary men (Robert Donat) dragged into extraordinary situations, sexy blondes (Madeline Carroll), etc. It is nowhere near one of his finest pictures, but it is worth a look, as is Hitchcock and Selznick, a great book by Leonard J. Leff about the fiercely independent director and the controlling producer who brought him to America, and their collaboration over six acrimonious years in the forties that resulted in Rebecca (1940), Spellbound (1945), Notorious (1946), and The Paradine Case (1947).
Posted by Editor at 22:30:20 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |